Today I read a story that did not surprise me. It was that the Olympic athlete Mo Farah has admitted to beating up a man who apparently 'got in his way' while he was running in Richmond Park in 2009. The man was walking with a woman with a pushchair and Farah insisted that they moved out of his way as he was training along the path. The path is in a park that is open to the public, it is not a sports arena not even a sports centre, it is free to people to walk around. Farah called the police and tried to get the other man charged, arguing that he had started it. However, Farah had left the man so injured that the police would not believe Farah's version of events. Now Farah is black and the other man's ethnicity is not given. Typically, if I had heard the story I would have assumed that a white man had punch Farah and the police sympathised with the white man. However, Farah condemns himself by his own words in his autobiography. Yes, he may be a nationally recognised athlete, but that gives him no authority to order members of the public about and then to attack them viciously if they do not comply with their wishes.
The fact that Farah cannot see what he has done wrong and how he has bullied and then attacked people going about everyday business, it was Christmas Day when you expect many people to be walking in Richmond Park, shows how far removed from reality his mindset is. Can you imagine his indignation if he had been out with his family and the story had happened in reverse? Yet, the reason why he cannot see it this way is because we live in an increasingly divided society. Many people think they are better than everyone else. In part by writing this blog, I am subscribing to that view, because I feel my words are right and are worth reading. However, the lauding of sports people as with members of the military, leads to them having an inflated attitude of themselves. Yes, instruct people where they are to go if you are on a running track or keep them off a military installation, but do not think that extends to a park. It has rules which are enforced by officials connected to the park and in many parks in London even by a specific park police. However, that power does not extend to every individual who is upset that someone else has happened to choose at the same time. That is life, just get over it, do not attack people.
You might argue that Mo Farah has such recognition and status that other people should do what he wishes. I feel that no-one not even the Queen has such a right. If people are acting within the law, then no-one can censure their behaviour. Pushing a pushchair in a park is not a crime. Even if you feel that people like Farah should have special privileges, this does not mean they extend to every sports person whether they compete at a national, country or local level or are just hobbyists. However, as I have noted before, Farah might be at one end of the wedge, but there are thousands of others who see his kind of behaviour as acceptable for them too. I have written here before about abuse I have received from 'proper' cyclists in all the expensive kit as if I was contaminating their space, simply cycling along a public road (not in a velodrome or along a cycle race route). They feel they constantly have to assert that they are better. The same applies to runners especially alongside canals but also on pavements and even on roads. I remember cycling down a hill in a residential area that was poorly lit suddenly to find tens of runners coming right the breadth of the road towards me. Unlike them I was lit up, they were the ones who shouted at me to get out of the road. They felt they had the privilege to run where they liked and somehow I should know this was their route. I just hoped a 4x4 would skid around the corner and collide with them to reduce their arrogance.
There are case after case that I could cite and more come to mind as I write this: swimmers who feel that the lane rules (i.e. swimming clockwise or anti-clockwise and keeping to a certain speed in specific lanes) do not apply to them and power up and down the centre of the slow lane. Yes, be confident, but putting on your running kit or getting on to an expensive bicycle does not make you better than me and certainly not better than the elderly people you terrorise. Yes, it is admirable that you are doing some sport, but it is admirable that that couple are walking with their child or that elderly person is getting to the shops and back. I used to respect Farah. I have worked in the area he lives in and have met people who have trained with him. He seems a joyous, friendly, family man who has achieved a great deal for Britain. Yet, when running in a public space, he needs to remember that he is in fact no better than the rest of us. To assume that you have rights above that of other ordinary people is bad enough; to beat up someone for simply walking in a park is something utterly shameful and he has lost my respect by his own confession.
Showing posts with label sport. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sport. Show all posts
Sunday, 13 October 2013
Thursday, 27 June 2013
Has Cycling Become Simply A Poser's Hobby?
As regular readers will know, after being bullied for twelve months, I went into melt down and ended up losing my house and living with my parents, something which proved to be more of a challenge than I had anticipated. Not only were there the issues of being around them but also the fact that they have lived in the same house since 1968 meant that there were far too many ghosts of the people who had bullied me for around a decade in my youth in the small town where they live to allow me comfortably to go out around there. Consequently, I tend to keep to my room and play games. Eventually I managed to find a room closer to my work and moved to South-West London, into districts I had never visited before. Whilst many of the locals are very rich and come with attitudes of the kind that make the government insufferable, I felt pretty comfortable here. With my mental health a lot better, I started looking at my physical health. I had put on about 5Kg since things had started going wrong. I am supposed to be 82Kg for my height, but have typically been 90Kg since the mid-2000s; 95Kg was certainly too much.
My job is not well paid and given that I am so physically unattractive I can alarm people in sporting venues, gym membership was out of the question. I have failed at fencing and Aikido, so such sports seemed to be pointless, though I did consider badminton, though was worried it would simply be too middle class all round. I was not able to find any swimming pools around. I considered taking up running. It seems to be a common urban sport. In addition, I have always had a curiosity to find out where specific roads go to. My interest in modernist and other 20th century architecture means that I can actually find going through suburbs pretty interesting. I know it is sad, but there it is. Given I have spent much of my life living in suburbs, I suppose it is a good safety mechanism. Saying that I would never go back to Perivale. That exceeded my tedium level and I could not get out of there fast enough. I imagined that running would be a comparatively cheap sport. Yes, I might need so decent shoes and one of those fluorescent tops that would keep me safe but not sweat too much. However, reading 'The Guardian' guide to running last month: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-running-blog/2013/may/28/running-etiquette-10-commandments I was utterly put off even trying. It might have been good for my fitness but facing up to the scrutiny and the disdain were too much and threatened to throw me into the haunted state I had when living with my parents. I know the locals now and disdain flows from every pore even if you skulk away from them. Shoving myself into their line of sight so clearly was bound to lead to heckling. I have experienced this when cycling for not wearing cleats, but the advantage is you can get away from it easier than when running.
With running ruled out, I thought of a return to cycling. As regular readers know, I used to cycle a great deal, even going on cycling holidays of my own making. One key problem is that I cannot cycle fast enough. I average 14.5kph (around 9mph) whereas cycling clubs require you to go at 15mph (24kph). My father averages 10kph but he is 75 so I think they give him some leeway. My father only cycles mid-week and whilst he comes past my work, I would only cycle on weekends so there would be no chance of humiliatingly running into him. There was one big challenge and that was that whilst I had a bike that had once cost £329 (I got it in a terrible state for £90), I had not ridden it much. The last time had been when unemployed in 2012 and I had felt terrible vertigo as if I was constantly going to crash over the handlebars; I often felt nauseous though never actually vomited. That was on a 3Km ride to and from the job centre. I thought that given my blood pressure was down, I should be in a better state. However, thinking about it the woman who used to live in my house had similar symptoms and had to stop motorbiking as a result, so maybe there was some inner ear infection we caught, I do not know.
Anyway, the decision about whether to return to my bicycle was soon made for me. I know I live in a snobby area, but no-one who cycled passed me did not look like they were about to race for a leading team. The bicycles were generally more expensive than my car (it is insured for £1000); I have now seen bicycles for sale at twice that amount. Even Halfords sells bicycles for £850 (€977; US$1300); let alone the Giant dealership I passed, with bicycles for £4499 (€5699 - their exchange rate; US$6883). As when I drive it is clear that I would be disparaged for simply what I was using. The other thing is the clothing. Very few people ride around on a bicycle in normal clothes, let alone work clothes. The time when people would ride in their suit or overalls to work are long gone. The only people in ordinary clothes on a bicycle are either children generally in school uniform or people riding on the pavement. These days adults riding on the road, whether it is a weekday or the weekend must ride in a pristine cycle team strip. I used to have the Credit Agricole strip because Chris Boardman rode for that team and they were only bank in Falaise which would change my traveller's cheques. That was my kit until I got chocolate ice cream on it at a restaurant somewhere South of Fecamp. I guess these people change when they reach work and probably shower too. Given that my workplace has no air conditioning and the window beside me does not open; it has an extractor fan embedded in it which does not work but madly is cleaned periodically. I would arrive with sweat dripping from me and having to squeeze into a toilet cubicle to change.
What soon became apparent is that like football and running, cycling is no longer a democratic sport. Football was captured by the prosperous middle classes (as opposed to me who was middle class and not prosperous) in the 1990s and running soon after. In swimming there has been a similar attempt, but fortunately most pools at least leave some segments of the pool clear of the swimming lanes that these 'elite' practitioners favour to demonstrate their skills. Heaven help you if you attempt to swim in them, you will be swamped and even kicked to get back into the non-laned area. The sense that 'you are not doing it right' and thus open to public ridicule, sometimes very vocal, has now become embedded in all of these sports, cycling among them. It is as much about how you appear as about what you do or what benefit you are gaining. The other day I sat in central Esher for about an hour; 34 cyclists in small groups of individually came passed me going off in different directions. It is clearly a crossroads for different routes around that part of Surrey. Of those that I saw, and there may have been others I missed, only three cyclists, all men, were not wearing a pristine cycle team strip and riding a bike which, at least, would be at the top of Halfords range if not that of Giant.
As they whizz past, you get that look of disdain and often are told to get off the road, back on to the pavement, apparently nowadays the cycle path for those just using a bicycle as a mode of transport rather than a status symbol. Non-status symbol cyclists now get it from all sides. Of course, we have always been shouted at or pushed by car drivers, for 'being in the wrong place' or 'not knowing the law' especially when turning right or using a cycle lane. On the pavement the large pushchair mothers shout as if cycling there is tantamount you trying to abduct or crush their child and now the poser cyclists have a go at you for being where they want to be and not dressed 'right'.
Yes, you can have your Sky Rides around city centres and all of the initiatives to get more people cycling. However, it is too late, certainly in southern England. Too many influential people want to keep the average person off their bicycle. As with running and visiting gyms, cycling is now the preserve of the rich. They identify themselves by what they wear and ride and have no tolerance for 'plebs' trying get in on the game. It is all about status, as Professor Felipe Fernandez- Armesto when lecturing on the cultural perceptions of fatness, it has all been turned on its head from three centuries ago. Then it was the rich who were seen as fat as they could afford to eat well. Now it is the rich who are the slim ones, sometimes looking as if they are starved, because they can still afford to eat well; our definition of 'well' having changed. Thus, they are going to prevent any ordinary person from exercising so that they cannot aspire to even look like their 'betters'. They do this by making it so unpleasant to take part that individuals abandon it for not wanting to suffer further chastisement. I was blind to this, but realise now that I own no house, living in a sub-let room and drive a 15-year old car, there is no way I would be accepted into the ranks of cyclists and to even try is to open me up to more of the bullying I have too often experienced in my life.
P.P. 06/08/2013
I read an article in 'The Guardian' on Saturday 3rd August 2013 which seemed to sum up my fears. One person interviewed said that 'cycling has become the new golf' for upper middle class males. The newspaper's own coverage of Sunday's 100-mile ride for serious amateurs seemed to reinforce this view. It is all about the kit and now increasingly about downloading the statistics regarding your ride from some on-board device. Performance now seems to out-rank achievement. Despite the newspaper arguing that cycling has become 'less cliquey' in fact itself is showing that simply the clique has shifted from rather nerdy individuals of the past to snobby ones of the present. Nothing is going to keep me away from cycling more than knowing I am going to be heckled for not only what I am wearing and riding but also what electronic equipment I might be carrying. Cycling, like running is now an elitist hobby. What is going to be next? Darts?
My job is not well paid and given that I am so physically unattractive I can alarm people in sporting venues, gym membership was out of the question. I have failed at fencing and Aikido, so such sports seemed to be pointless, though I did consider badminton, though was worried it would simply be too middle class all round. I was not able to find any swimming pools around. I considered taking up running. It seems to be a common urban sport. In addition, I have always had a curiosity to find out where specific roads go to. My interest in modernist and other 20th century architecture means that I can actually find going through suburbs pretty interesting. I know it is sad, but there it is. Given I have spent much of my life living in suburbs, I suppose it is a good safety mechanism. Saying that I would never go back to Perivale. That exceeded my tedium level and I could not get out of there fast enough. I imagined that running would be a comparatively cheap sport. Yes, I might need so decent shoes and one of those fluorescent tops that would keep me safe but not sweat too much. However, reading 'The Guardian' guide to running last month: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-running-blog/2013/may/28/running-etiquette-10-commandments I was utterly put off even trying. It might have been good for my fitness but facing up to the scrutiny and the disdain were too much and threatened to throw me into the haunted state I had when living with my parents. I know the locals now and disdain flows from every pore even if you skulk away from them. Shoving myself into their line of sight so clearly was bound to lead to heckling. I have experienced this when cycling for not wearing cleats, but the advantage is you can get away from it easier than when running.
With running ruled out, I thought of a return to cycling. As regular readers know, I used to cycle a great deal, even going on cycling holidays of my own making. One key problem is that I cannot cycle fast enough. I average 14.5kph (around 9mph) whereas cycling clubs require you to go at 15mph (24kph). My father averages 10kph but he is 75 so I think they give him some leeway. My father only cycles mid-week and whilst he comes past my work, I would only cycle on weekends so there would be no chance of humiliatingly running into him. There was one big challenge and that was that whilst I had a bike that had once cost £329 (I got it in a terrible state for £90), I had not ridden it much. The last time had been when unemployed in 2012 and I had felt terrible vertigo as if I was constantly going to crash over the handlebars; I often felt nauseous though never actually vomited. That was on a 3Km ride to and from the job centre. I thought that given my blood pressure was down, I should be in a better state. However, thinking about it the woman who used to live in my house had similar symptoms and had to stop motorbiking as a result, so maybe there was some inner ear infection we caught, I do not know.
Anyway, the decision about whether to return to my bicycle was soon made for me. I know I live in a snobby area, but no-one who cycled passed me did not look like they were about to race for a leading team. The bicycles were generally more expensive than my car (it is insured for £1000); I have now seen bicycles for sale at twice that amount. Even Halfords sells bicycles for £850 (€977; US$1300); let alone the Giant dealership I passed, with bicycles for £4499 (€5699 - their exchange rate; US$6883). As when I drive it is clear that I would be disparaged for simply what I was using. The other thing is the clothing. Very few people ride around on a bicycle in normal clothes, let alone work clothes. The time when people would ride in their suit or overalls to work are long gone. The only people in ordinary clothes on a bicycle are either children generally in school uniform or people riding on the pavement. These days adults riding on the road, whether it is a weekday or the weekend must ride in a pristine cycle team strip. I used to have the Credit Agricole strip because Chris Boardman rode for that team and they were only bank in Falaise which would change my traveller's cheques. That was my kit until I got chocolate ice cream on it at a restaurant somewhere South of Fecamp. I guess these people change when they reach work and probably shower too. Given that my workplace has no air conditioning and the window beside me does not open; it has an extractor fan embedded in it which does not work but madly is cleaned periodically. I would arrive with sweat dripping from me and having to squeeze into a toilet cubicle to change.
What soon became apparent is that like football and running, cycling is no longer a democratic sport. Football was captured by the prosperous middle classes (as opposed to me who was middle class and not prosperous) in the 1990s and running soon after. In swimming there has been a similar attempt, but fortunately most pools at least leave some segments of the pool clear of the swimming lanes that these 'elite' practitioners favour to demonstrate their skills. Heaven help you if you attempt to swim in them, you will be swamped and even kicked to get back into the non-laned area. The sense that 'you are not doing it right' and thus open to public ridicule, sometimes very vocal, has now become embedded in all of these sports, cycling among them. It is as much about how you appear as about what you do or what benefit you are gaining. The other day I sat in central Esher for about an hour; 34 cyclists in small groups of individually came passed me going off in different directions. It is clearly a crossroads for different routes around that part of Surrey. Of those that I saw, and there may have been others I missed, only three cyclists, all men, were not wearing a pristine cycle team strip and riding a bike which, at least, would be at the top of Halfords range if not that of Giant.
As they whizz past, you get that look of disdain and often are told to get off the road, back on to the pavement, apparently nowadays the cycle path for those just using a bicycle as a mode of transport rather than a status symbol. Non-status symbol cyclists now get it from all sides. Of course, we have always been shouted at or pushed by car drivers, for 'being in the wrong place' or 'not knowing the law' especially when turning right or using a cycle lane. On the pavement the large pushchair mothers shout as if cycling there is tantamount you trying to abduct or crush their child and now the poser cyclists have a go at you for being where they want to be and not dressed 'right'.
Yes, you can have your Sky Rides around city centres and all of the initiatives to get more people cycling. However, it is too late, certainly in southern England. Too many influential people want to keep the average person off their bicycle. As with running and visiting gyms, cycling is now the preserve of the rich. They identify themselves by what they wear and ride and have no tolerance for 'plebs' trying get in on the game. It is all about status, as Professor Felipe Fernandez-
P.P. 06/08/2013
I read an article in 'The Guardian' on Saturday 3rd August 2013 which seemed to sum up my fears. One person interviewed said that 'cycling has become the new golf' for upper middle class males. The newspaper's own coverage of Sunday's 100-mile ride for serious amateurs seemed to reinforce this view. It is all about the kit and now increasingly about downloading the statistics regarding your ride from some on-board device. Performance now seems to out-rank achievement. Despite the newspaper arguing that cycling has become 'less cliquey' in fact itself is showing that simply the clique has shifted from rather nerdy individuals of the past to snobby ones of the present. Nothing is going to keep me away from cycling more than knowing I am going to be heckled for not only what I am wearing and riding but also what electronic equipment I might be carrying. Cycling, like running is now an elitist hobby. What is going to be next? Darts?
Labels:
cycling,
Professor Felipe Fernandez-Armesto,
running,
Sky Ride,
snobbery,
sport,
swimming,
UK society
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)