Fiction
'A Dance with Dragons 2: After the Feast' by George R.R. Martin
This is the second part of the fifth, and, so far, final book in Martin's 'A Song of Ice and Fire' series. It was published in 2011 and, while Martin has promised a sixth book, he has gone off to other projects instead. This part is slightly better than the first part, but as with that and the previous book, the series has entirely lost momentum. It is easy to understand why the writers of the television series based on the books, 'A Game of Thrones' have increasingly diverged from the novels, leaving out entire characters, but also introducing a great deal more action. I would really love to read a novelisation of the series rather than these books.
Opportunities for excitement are avoided. In the series Stannis Baratheon marches against Winterfell and has to sacrifice his daughter in the hope he will win. He is defeated in a major battle and is ultimately killed by Brienne of Tarth who has been hunting him to exact vengeance for his magical murder of his brother. In the book, his siege train simply gets stuck in the snow and dies very slowly without even reaching Winterfell. Similarly Daenerys Targaryen sits in Mereen for a long time thinking, gets married, and flies off on her dragon. There is lots of worrying but very little action. Tyrion Lannister spends his time as an entertainment slave and has very little role in developments. We hear no more of Sansa Stark, in contrast to the series; we hear no more of Brandon Stark or Sam Tarly or happenings in Dorne and so on.
The writers of the series drive the story on whereas, very frustratingly, Martin just wallows in the vast structure he has created, with no clear sense of where it is going. You have to admire the world he has crafted but instead of enjoying this book, I laboured through it and am looking to prequels and other output which remembers that an epic story is no story if nothing much happens.
'Conquest' by Stewart Binns
This was a disappointing book. It focuses on the life of Hereward of Bourne, popularly known as Hereward the Wake, who led a guerrilla war against the Norman occupation of England following the Battle of Hastings in October 1066. The book follows him from his youth, through the Battles of Stamford Bridge and Hastings - he is at both - to his exile from England following subsequent defeat by King William I at Ely. The King is portrayed very much as a brutal dictator in this novel. This was Binns's first novel and there is an air of naivety about it. Aside from a couple of sex scenes, it feels very much like a book Henry Treece (1911-66) would have written for children in the 1950s. Everything is very earnest and the good and the bad are painted in stark colours. There are few moments of real tension, which can be achieved even in historical novels when we know the outcome as seen in 'Munich' by Robert Harris which I listened to last month.
The book owes a lot to 'The Last English King' (1997) by Julian Rathbone with Hereward even ending up in Byzantine Greece. However, even more than that book it is a labour and because of the lack of tension, it becomes a depressing book as Hereward steadily moves towards defeat and loses his 'family' the friends he has acquired through the book which have become rather like one of these superhero ensemble movies currently so possible. Binns also has not learned how to get historical detail into a book without breaking off to give us a mini-lecture on who the person is and who their ancestors are. We hear about the War of the Three Sanchos (1065-67) in the Iberian Peninsula without this having any real relevance to the story. Binns was very fortunate to get a publishing contract for this book and certainly needs to work at his craft as a novel writer if he is going to produce satisfying books.
'Knots and Crosses' by Ian Rankin
I have been given a lot of books from Ian Rankin's Rebus detective stories. This one, set in Edinburgh in 1985 is the first. In an introduction which was added to this edition, Rankin outlines how this was his first novel and that he knew nothing about police procedure, though he was able to get up to speed liaising with staff from a Leith police station. At times the book feels like a first novel and I imagine a more experienced author would not have relied so much on coincidence or have a lead character with such an incredible background and then ironically one who is pretty ineffectual. At first it appears that the 'hero' Detective Sergeant John Rebus is only going to be on the edges of the investigation of a serial killer of children. However, ultimately it turns out that he is right at the centre and as much a victim as an investigator. However, Rebus, though seeming rather downbeat and hardly sharp, is not simply a former paratrooper, but also a trained member of an elite sub-unit of the S.A.S. specifically trained to fight in the civil war which had been expected in Northern Ireland in the late 1970s/early 1980s; the legacy of his training comes back to haunt him in all senses of the word.
There are some pretty well drawn characters, though, as Rankin notes himself it does feel all very historical now, especially the bars and the journalists in an age when the mobile phone is uncommon and computers in police stations are handled by a small band of specialists, though Rankin reveals good insight in what was to come. Rebus's brother, a drug-dealing stage hypnotists appears interesting at the start but soon seems to just be a plot device. Rebus's ex-wife taking his boss's son as her lover, seems particularly contorted. The book is quirky enough to keep one's interest and it moves along briskly, describing Edinburgh and people in it well. It was not as outstanding as I had expected from the acclaim that has been heaped upon it, but it was not sufficiently disappointing that I will throw out the others in the series that I have been given.
'Cartomancy' by Mary Gentle
This is a selection of short stories. I had been slightly misled by it as 'cartomancy' actually means telling the future using playing cards, but though Gentle does feature some tarot dice in one story in fact she uses it more to mean telling things by using maps. I read 'Rats and Gargoyles' (1990) many years ago, but this book does not really make much sense and you have read a lot of her other books, notably, 'Ash: A Secret History' (2000), 'Grunts!' (1992) and the Orthe trilogy, 1984-2002. This is because many of the stories are prequels or offcuts from these series. Most do not stand well as simply short stories without knowing those contexts, which Gentle only tells us about in numerous 'afterwords'. There are some interesting counter-factuals, such as a Visigoth kingdom in Tunisia and Burgundy being a dominant country in Europe in the late 20th century. It is interesting to see the female warriors she includes.
There are some which are decent as short stories, 'Kitsune' and how the eponymous character wrecks lives, 'The Harvest of Wolves' set in a 20th century Britain where austerity has become authoritarian, 'The Pits Beneath the World' about a human uncovering lifecycles on an alien planet and 'Cast a Long Shadow' which is a good piece of magic realism set in 20th century Britain. 'Orc's Drift' is really silly. The rest are clearly disconnected parts of novels or prequels and while some have some good ideas, though not satisfactorily developed and because we do not know who these characters become, they lack the import that Gentle tries to instil in the afterwords. 'A Shadow under the Sea' about battling a Kraken is probably the best of these. 'Human Waste' is utterly horrendous. I know authors have licence and nanobots being able to repair a child in seconds seems to make the impact lesser, but I certainly do not welcome a story of sustained cruelty and physical abuse repeated over the space of some minutes. I get the point, but regret ever coming near that story.
Overall, then, this is really only a book for dedicated fans of Mary Gentle. Even then I would advise against reading 'Human Waste'.
Fiction - Audio Books
'From Russia with Love' by Ian Fleming; read by Toby Stephens
The movie (1963) of this novel (1957) is my favourite of the James Bond dramatisations and is one that feels most like a spy movie than a kind of international crime drama. In the novel, there are continuities with other books. Bond's relationship with Tiffany Case from 'Diamonds Are Forever' (1956) has just come to an end with her returning to the USA with an American major. The snagging of Bond's .25 Beretta (the 6.35mm Beretta 418 pistol which was still in production in the 1950s) in this novel leads to him being issued with the Walther PPK in 'Dr. No' (1958). In the movie, Bond is facing the international crime syndicate SPECTRE whereas in the book he simply continues to battle Smersh, the unit of the Soviet intelligence organisation which carries out torture and executions. He has crossed them in 'Casino Royale' (1953) and effectively battled their agents of in 'Live and Let Die' (1954); Sir Hugo Drax in 'Moonraker' (1955), in contrast, has been backed by GRU, the Soviet military intelligence body. However, overall, the books are more clearly Cold War novels in a way that, by the time the movies were made and there was some brief thawing, it was not felt appropriate.
There is much from the book, including specific lines of dialogue which made it into the movie. The significant characters are the same. Fleming loves extended descriptions of people, especially the opposition. We encounter the first female opponent of the novels in Colonel Rosa Klebb, a Smersh torturer with poisoned knitting needles rather than a shoe spike as in the movie, until the very end. She is rather overwritten, but does come across as a genuinely sinister person especially in the descriptions of her torturing people. She is what he calls 'neuter', what we would call bisexual now rather than asexual, which is used to add to her sinister nature. There is Donovan 'Red' Grant, an Irishman in the book, a psychopath who loves killing and Kerim Bey, Bond's larger-than-life contact in Istanbul. Even as an ebullient ally he is portrayed as having a dark side, having kept a woman chained naked in his house when a young man. Interestingly, the entire first section of the book does not feature Bond except being discussed in the third person; we see Grant's and Tatiana Romanova's lives inside the USSR and the behaviour of the men controlling them. At the time I guess this would be something unfamiliar to readers, but it re-emphasised to readers then why the Soviet system needed to be opposed by Bond.
As I have noted with the previous novels, Bond makes mistakes, often serious mistakes. As Grant notes, throughout this story, the Soviets are able to play on Bond's vanity and curiosity to manoeuvre him almost precisely where they want him. Only the availability of a 'gadget', the first to appear in the books, a throwing knife concealed in his attaché case, saves Bond from simply being shot and humiliated. The other elements are there as in the movie, such as watching the Soviet embassy through a periscope; Kerim Bey's sons; shooting a Bulgarian agent as he escapes through a billboard advertising a movie; the fights at the gipsy camp; Bond foolishly allowing himself to be filmed through a two-way mirror in a hotel, even the breakfast he eats. The climax comes in Paris rather than Venice and Kronsteen, the chess master, has not been killed. In this book, the Lektor of the movie, is called the Spektor and it is booby-trapped. Bond is shown as complacent to the very end and when the book was published, the cliff-hanger must have been gripping for readers.
Toby Stephens, who appeared in the Bond movie, 'Die Another Day' (2002) is very good at the voices, having to affect a range of Russians. His Kerim Bey is particularly good and the way he portrays Grant using his own voice and then acting as Nash, is subtly handled. Overall, this is a quite gripping book especially as we can see how fallible Bond is and how easily he is played. The Soviets almost manage to pull it off. There are rich, if highly unpleasant, characters throughout, that stay the right side of being caricatures. I have already listened to 'Dr. No' so the next one in series for me is 'Goldfinger' (1959).
'A Reconstructed Corpse' by Simon Brett; radio play with narration by Bill Nighy
I met Brett in the 2000s and have read one of his novels in a different series, 'The Body on the Beach' (2000). This one is the 15th story (of 20 at present), published in 1993, from the Charles Paris series so far published 1975-2018, though with a long break, 1993-2013. This explains why Paris seems rather anachronistic, regularly referencing 1960s and 1970s pop songs. This is one of a number of Radio 4 dramatisations of the novels, that are sometimes also available on demand via the BBC I-Player. It is kind of a hybrid though, because while many scenes are acted, there is a regular first-person narration from the character of Paris, perfectly portrayed by Nighy in his kind of washed up, but positive old actor/rock star approach which he sometimes portrays, e.g. in 'Love Actually' (2003).
It moves along briskly and snatches of pop songs indicate chapters well. In many ways Paris is an old fashioned character, an (attempted) womaniser and heavy drinker who flits between minor acting roles. However, Nighy ebullience and contemporary references keep this feeling fresh rather than jaded. In this book, perhaps unexpectedly, the relationship with Paris's long-suffering wife, Frances, played by Suzanne Burden becomes an interesting reflection on middle-aged relationships and I like how Frances takes the lead in some of the amateur detection, which in this novel focuses on corrupt police and a public information programme called 'Citizen's Arrest'. These CDs often turn up cheap, and having enjoyed this one, I will look out for others.
'The Book Thief' by Markus Zusak; read by Allan Corduner
I had become vaguely aware of this book, first published in 2006 due to publicity about the DVD of the movie, which I am surprised to find first came out in 2013. Anyway, this is a very dense book. Most audio books last 3-4 hours, this one is 14 hours. It primarily covers the life of a German girl, Liesel Meminger living in a suburb of Munich 1939-43. The narrator is Death, though more human and tangible yet far less fixed than the usual portrayals of personified death. The book reminds a great deal of 'Cider with Rosie' (1959) by Laurie Lee, in that it goes into immense detail about the life of a girl. Thus, beside the events of the war, concealing a Jew and the bombing there is a lot about her life. For some reason at the age of 10 she is still illiterate, despite having Communist parents. She is taken to be fostered in Molching when her father is arrested and her mother, we assume is soon taken too. Her brother dies on the journey to Bavaria and is buried. Her foster parents have grown-up children and are poor. They treat her rather erratically, the mother in particular, but with affection. The story then orbits around her school days, her friends and neighbours in Himmel Street, her participation in the BDM branch of the Hitler Youth and occasionally stealing books, fruit and vegetables.
In some ways I was disheartened to be read another book about wartime Germany with many of the standard tropes. The characters do lighten it, despite all the tragedies that so many of them face; most of the people we meet do not make it to the end of the book, but that is probably no surprise. The style with Death narrating, jumping back and forth in time and stopping to give little lectures on his/her existence and interaction with humans, is fine for a bit, but quickly becomes tiresome. This is the main problem with the book, it is very heavy going. There is so much to get through at such a slow pace that you are quickly exhausted of all the conceits of the approach. The messages about escape through reading and authoring and the need for basic humanity, as a result, feel piled on and by the end you lose interest in them. With this heavyweight approach it would have been fine just to feature a single year in Liesel Meminger's life, rather than four. By going on so much, with so much passion and so many characters, by the end you have lost a lot of sympathy for anyone featured. I came out of this book feeling exhausted and rather unhappy that I had ever started on it.
Allan Corduner is excellent as Death with rich and in turns flippant and thoughtful tones for this character. He is not bad at voicing the children, though better with the adults, especially Liesel's foster father, Hans Hubermann. His German is good too and listening to the book reminded me of numerous phrases that I had long forgotten from my youth when visiting and living in Germany. Last time I was there was in 2005 but that was more than 15 years since the previous time.
Non-Fiction
'Crowded Hours. An Autobiography' by Eric Roll
This is another author who I have met, back in the 1990s when working for the Warburg Bank. He is the only person who I have met who was born in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He lived in the Austrian part which is now in Romania, but came to Britain in 1931 and naturalised. He was an early arrival in the wave of Central European economists who became so important for the British government from the 1940s to the late 1960s. The book is very brisk, at times listing all the people he encountered in his career; generally viewing them positively. Roll was involved in numerous international committees including on wartime food supplies, the allocation of Marshall Aid and on Britain's first application to join the EEC in 1961-63. He was also an academic and worked a lot in the USA before leaving the civil service in the late 1960s to enter finance and private banking.
The book is apt to read at the moment on two grounds. The first basis are the challenges of international negotiations. Some of the commentary could have been written about Brexit negotiations now. However, what is apparent is that the British have utterly lost the skill of working on international bodies to come to a satisfactory, even if not superb, outcome. Perhaps we have become too dogmatic; maybe we have lost those internationalists of Roll's generation, adept at a range of languages and able to understand the views of others even while disagreeing with them or seeing them as to Britain's disadvantage.
The other useful aspect of this book is that Roll breaks off from the narrative periodically to bring analysis of economic approaches as found in this other, less personal books. He is a centrist economically and proposes a kind of social market economy of the kind seen in West Germany in the third quarter of the 20th century - this being the 1994 edition of the book. He certainly points to the unhealthiness of dogmatism, rather hooded criticisms of Thatcherite obsession with monetarism. Roll seeks the greatest range of tools and criticises the focus just on interest rates for Keynesianism and on the money supply for the Thatcherism that followed. He also speaks wisely about the changes coming to the City of London and the need for a sensible degree of control. Some of his fears in this regard were witnessed in 2008.
Roll was very much a man of his time, but his wealth of experience in academia, the civil service and business and his even-handed approach to negotiations and economic approaches means that even now what he wrote provides quite a refreshing view of how things could be being done better, especially in terms of exiting the EU.
Non-Fiction - Audio Books
'Seven Pillars of Wisdom' by T.E.Lawrence; read by Jim Norton
This seems to be a popular book for putting into audio formats as I see there is a version read by Roy McMillan is also on sale. This is largely a non-fiction book, but I believe it was in 'The Legacy of Lawrence of Arabia' (2010) presented by Rory Stewart that showed he had been a bit liberal with some of the truth, for example shortening journey times he had recorded in his diaries when he produced this book. The most notable is saying it took him 49 hours to get from Aqaba to the Suez Canal when it took 70 hours as recorded in his diary.
The book covers Lawrence's involvement with the Arab Revolt in 1916-18, up the western coast of what is now Saudi Arabia through present-day Israel to Damascus in Syria, at the time all territories held by the Ottoman Empire, an ally of Germany. Lawrence's largely self-appointed mission was to bring together the wide diversity of Arabic tribes in the region and carry out a kind of guerrilla war, though securing towns along the Red Sea coast. Much of his work was in leading raiding parties especially attacking trains, bringing more tribes into the fight and funding and training them.
Lawrence makes an epic story of what he was involved with. In particular he makes very little mention of his failures beyond acknowledging them. It would be interesting to know what went wrong on the failed raids as much as we learn about how he helped with the successes. Sensibly he punctuates the battle scenes with detail of life among Arabs and at various locations on his journey, giving a rich picture of the culture he was moving among and was largely accepted into. He spends a lot of time describing individual men and their characters (the book features very, very few women) of the tendency of the early-mid 20th Century writing (Fleming does this all the time too) and describes nationalities in a way that many current readers would find patronising if not verging on racist. This is not confined to the Arabs and Turks as he is highly dismissive of Indian and Australian soldiers. In contrast he goes overboard in praising General Edmund Allenby (1861-1936), though for a man of the time, the general appreciated the risks of indulging in crusader analogies and the risk of offending the largely Muslim population.
It is interesting, despite the popularity of the book with politicians and generals of the time, that the assault on the port of Aqaba (now in Jordan) achieved after a lengthy march across the desert that Lawrence recounts in detail, had so little attention paid to it. His ability to capture the town with a light camel-borne force because the landward side was unprotected in the expectation of any attack coming from the sea, was much paralleled in the fall of British-held Singapore in February 1942 to Japanese troops behaving in a very similar way, because of the lack of landward protection.
Lawrence articulates the guilt he felt throughout his mission, knowing from early on that the British were not going to permit the bulk of the independent Arab states that they were peddling as a way to try to gain support from Arab fighters. He hoped that an Arab victory would free them from the imperial constraints, but all but Saudi Arabia became part of the British or French Empire following the Paris Peace Treaties. Thus, while the book comes over as something from the age of high imperialism and with attitudes that would expect from that time, it is, at times, tempered by a different appreciation.
We know that Lawrence was a masochist and was probably homosexual or perhaps bisexual. Thus, his frankness, especially when he is being anally raped by Turkish soldiers must have been shocking at the time the book was published in 1926. At times it is unsettling that he seems to revel in physical discomfort and there are graphic descriptions of the hardships of riding for many hours on camels, with the sores and injuries that he sustains. He seems to relish describing death and decay such as after attacks and in the conditions of the Turkish Hospital in Damascus which he recondition and improved. It can be argued that he was in harsh conditions and reflected them for a soft audience back home. However, from the start when talking about slavery in the Arab world, he seems too supportive of these aspects and this trait appears to be borne out by the actions in his life, exposing himself to discomfort and abasing himself. In that regard, it takes a strong stomach to engage with this book and I was left feeling disturbed by it. Despite these aspects, the book is brisk if one sided, being focused on his successes. There are some very dramatic scenes and interesting information on the cultures of the region at the time.
I must say the little booklet which come with the CDs is invaluable for following the progression of the campaign Lawrence was involved with, especially when working beyond more familiar cities like Mecca, Medina, Jerusalem and Damascus, in places that are obscure but were strategically important. Jim Norton is perfect for the narration of this book. As it is an autobiography he is not obliged to do voices for a range of characters. However, he handles the numerous Arabic names of people, tribes and places very well. He speaks in a way that you feel as if it is Lawrence himself addressing you. In some ways, however, this brings home the pain and suffering even more sharply than if he sounded like someone telling a story from decades past.
Saturday, 30 June 2018
The Books I Listened To/Read In June
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment